It is currently Tue Jan 16, 2018 4:15 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
From Cracked. I am not a man of refined taste...


CRACKED.COM wrote:
I Can't Stop: Living With An Addiction To Child Porn

By: Anonymous
January 02, 2017
Cracked.com



The difference between pedophilia and child molestation is a conversation that absolutely nobody wants to have. It's depressing enough to contemplate people being sexually attracted to children without getting into which model of windowless van they prefer. But they say knowledge is power, so let's power up.


What is a ‘sexual attraction’? People leaching off each other-?

Is dominating a rag doll part of sexual attraction?

Sex is misdefined, or rather it was defined by dickheads. That knowledge is power- not knowledge of what a day in the life of some pedobear is like.



Quote:
A pedophile is someone attracted to prepubescent children, while a child molester is someone who sexually abuses them. Although not every pedophile will molest a child, most of them look at child pornography, which obviously hurts the children forced to participate in it. Unfortunately, demand is high. To understand this problem better, we reached out to one of the consumers. We spoke to "Charlie," who's been arrested twice for possession of child pornography. He's not looking for sympathy, or trying to play the victim.


There is no difference between a child molester and a pedophile. There is only a difference between their actions. They are part of the same force. IOW, there is no such thing as a pedophile. There is only child abuse.

The crime won’t go away without the desire.

There are more ways to hurt children than just sexualish abuse. That is the creepiest kind of child abuse, sure… But abuse is bad according to the victim, not the perp.

I see this with collateral damage- tear someones head off from afar, with a bomb, from a plane, and express remorse and regret and this is somehow morally superior to unrepentantly doing it with a sword…


The whole gist of this article- despite a disclaimer at the outset and prevarications thru out- is that 'Charlie' loves children just a little too much, he's a pedophile see- someone attracted to children, just like daddy found mommy pretty enough to hand his life over- he's not a monster (and I spose he's not- he is struggling with something monstrous, something he carries on his back and may devour children at any time!) Why he's still just some 12 year old himself...

Quote:
Ironically, Interest In Child Porn Often Starts As A Child


Thas not ironic. Children looking at porn is all part of the same thing as them being in porn… The scope, or level, is different. It’s a lower rung on a ladder of grief.

Porn itself, adult porn, is bad and not OK for adults, women and I spose men are being abused just as children are.

Our obligation to protect children is paramount tho. In a world less astray, protecting women would be the province of men instead of enemy territory, then protecting your bro. If that changed who knows…

We’ve misdefined porn. Is cleavage porn? College girls in leggings?

Legalized sensuality is abusive brain porn.



Quote:
"I was 12 years old when I first looked at pornography," Charlie explains. "At first it was adult pornography. Shortly after, I started looking at more and more porn. I kinda fell into a black hole in the internet which eventually led to taboo porn (BDSM, domination, etc.), which led to incest porn. Finally, while clicking around the many sites dedicated to incest porn, I found a link to a chat room. I was a kid in a chat room with a bunch of adults. I did not try to hide my age on there, either."

Needless to say, he suddenly found himself alarmingly popular.
Occasionally, the users would post child porn, and no one would make a big deal about it ... until they found out they had an actual child in their midst. Oh, they freaked out, but not in the way you'd hope. Charlie received many messages in that chat room, often accompanied by pornographic images of kids.
"These pictures were of kids my age," Charlie told us. "There wasn't anything wrong with me looking at this stuff, right? And that's exactly what the people in the chat would assure me of. They'd say things like, 'It's normal to look at these pictures ... a lot of people do, they just don't talk about it."

Sadly, that's probably the lie they were telling themselves, too.




In human cultures it is normal to do those things. Children have always been sexualized wrong here, because ‘sex’ has always been wrong here. It has always been a label smeared on people. Pertainment vs. partaking…

Children are having adult sex, abusive sex. It doesn’t matter what age their fucking partner is.


Quote:
This is grooming -- befriending a child and teaching them about sex like you're simply a pal and educator ... right up until you can demonstrate it to them in person. Fortunately for Charlie, he was smart enough to never meet any of these people in the real world. But what they said made sense to him. Why shouldn't he look at naked girls his own age? So he kept doing it.


Children are groomed in ways other than porn. It is worse when the grooming throws em on the dance floor as children, but still pretty bad as adults.

Also, Groom=Husband, Grooming is Husbandry. Husbandry is tending and tending in the intimacy we normally, correctly term sexual tends to require a woman.

Moving on -- There is nothing intrinsically wrong with seeing anyone naked at any age, tho I don’t much like dicks around children.

If culture and then, by extension- ‘sex’- didn’t exist here, by human design, to turn men into clay bitches and women into ice sculptures- then sex could never be a tool of oppression or abuse. But as we just keep trading the same chiefs with different tongues, I don't see that changing.


Oh, and Charlie did meet these people in the real world. He truly met those people- truth is here but not always of the matter- he truly met those people. They are part of the fabric, the quilt that suffocates and stitches children unto it’s self, blanket death.


Quote:
And you remember Matthew McConaughey's most famous quote, don't you?


That's what I love about these high school girls, man.



High School Girls, post-Sophomore I guess, ARE supposed to procreate! Thas the like, peak, natural age.

Society does not change that.

If sex wasn’t so loveless and gross and cumsoaked and degrading and weird, no one’d object!

Matthew McConaughey, F'ing 44, wagging his ass in 20 year old’s face is far worse than some male youth enjoying young women.

Of course enjoying young women here IS all kinds of messed up… It’s all pornographic. Doesn’t matter what age you are-


If sex is all about degrading women, even in resistance- resistance w/ legislation and by ideology itself- then how are healthy children born?



Quote:
4
Consuming Child Pornography Can Be Like An Addiction
While reading the confessions of professed pedophiles, which is not a fun hobby we would recommend, you start to notice that many of them talk about addiction. "I'm attracted to boys between 7 and 12, and I'm addicted to porn videos, photos and drawings," says one anonymous pedophile. "I often want to say 'stop,' I erase everything I have on my computer, I go to dating sites, I try to be normal but it never lasts I crack again I re download and spend sometimes the whole night looking at this porn files on my pc."
Charlie says, "When I was 15, I moved from Florida to Washington. It was here when I would say that I got addicted to child porn."

ronstik/iStock
One of the rare times Adult You would prefer that 15-Year-Old You had developed teen alcoholism instead.


Addiction nonsense. Separation of will and idea, substance and reflection. Dualism. Gnosis…

Good lord save us.

Also is there anything at all sexual about boys age 7-12? This is no 'sexual attraction' even if chuck is that age. I don’t know or wanna know what the F there’d be- I suppose affection if none were forthcoming from mother and father and sister... Who's to say?

You can bestow love on children. Children need to grow in love, with guidance. I suppose that gets perverted.

I recently had a problem with not drinking. I tried to stop drinking and I couldn’t fall asleep. Finally, after 6 days of no sleep, I sought help and vowed never to drink again.

Why’d I drink so much? I saw nothing worth loving in this world.

Men and women aren’t so much intimate w/ one another as women are intimacy themselves. They share it with a man who loves them.

The reason that sounds horrifying is the reason people are slapping female sexuality onto little boys!

Quote:
Many forms of addiction apparently develop much in the same way as grief. They stem from loneliness and isolation, and involve a lot of bargaining, anger, and depression. This is exactly how it went for Charlie. "I knew no one in Washington. On top of all the normal teenage hormones and angst, I had no friends. I ended up spending all day on the computer. I isolated myself. I spent probably seven hours a day looking at porn at the peak of my addiction."

Basically every waking hour not spent eating or at school, with nothing to show for it except a slew of felonies.
So like any other 15-year-old with an internet connection. But in Charlie's case, he was watching child porn. By then, Charlie was considerably older than the kids in his pornography of choice, which made it harder for him to justify watching it. That's when he entered the bargaining stage.



When every bargain is Faustian, the result is always hell. Children are killed, young woman opt for the dungeon… Same old shit, different day- every fucking time!

Quote:
"I set deadlines for myself," Charlie explains. "Like, one was when I have sex, then I'll stop. Like if I had sex with a girl my age, then I'd magically be cured of this addiction. Then, of course, I entered into a sexual relationship with a girl my age and I still didn't stop. Then it became when I turned 18 I would stop. This never happened, obviously."

When it destroys my life, I'll stop.
Eventually, Charlie started hating himself so much that he "literally could not look at myself in the mirror. I was disgusted with myself because I knew that what I was doing was wrong." And yet he couldn't stop. Remember, calling child porn an addiction doesn't justify it; it only helps us understand the problem better, and it may even help us find a way to stop non-offending pedophiles from ditching that vital prefix.


Chuck didn’t really know what he was doing was wrong. He was told it was wrong by hypocrites.

Human law has no bearing on right and wrong.

When J-law and K-kup unload naked pics of themselves on everyone and then play the victim- I look, oh do I look, because I don’t really think it’s wrong. I mean I know it is, but so much rigor is applied and yadda yadda F' you guys, Kate Upton is hot.



Charles has a projection problem, does he feel unlovable and project it to his self extrapolated and replaced? Abdicating father, scary mommy? Does he project love for his mother back to himself? Does he deflect love he does or doesn’t get from daddy? Love and hate make evil judo… And the rage and confusion, my God the rage and confusion.

Understanding pedophilia is an unnecessary evil. Legislation don’t do nothin-

And If I have to think Charlie loves little boys cuz of loneliness and porn, then society has to listen to me say bullshit. Society harbors disease, some get it some don't-

And if anyone doesn't think the purpose of this article and others like it is to spread the meme that the evil gene what spawns this form of child abuse doesn't need a cure-


Quote:
3
To Addicts, Even Prison Is Not A Deterrent


The addiction is not the prison. Don’t anyone say that-

Quote:
There are hundreds of ways to exchange illegal stuff, from carrier pigeons to chat rooms on the Dark Web. But Charlie didn't use any of them, and that's why he got caught at the age of 19.



If laws are laws, then underage photos are right there at X-videos in a docuporn about Linsey Dawn McKenzie. No one cares. Only reason i paid attention to pizzagate- It’s a literal, legal click away-


We know what this guy did was wrong- 7 year olds!?- a cavalcade of laws and agendas and subterfuge and circumvention is no good.



Quote:
This is indeed unusual. Child porn sentences are notoriously harsh, despite there being no mandatory minimum for possession of illegal material. Charlie should have gotten at least five years the first time. But even that wouldn't have stopped him from watching child porn; it only would've paused it for half a decade.


Recidivism for guys like Charlie is lower than commonly thought, but statistics didn't change his urges.
See, pedophilia is most likely hardwired in the brain. You can't just scare something like that away. Also, despite what pop culture tells us, it seems prison isn't that bad for all sex offenders.


NO! IT IS NOT HARDWIRED IN THE BRAIN! NOT AS PRESENTED!

It is not natural in the same way men desire women or women are attracted to men.

Quote:
"The first time, I spent my entire stay in protective custody. What that means is they put in you in a jail cell for 23 hours a day, and only let you out when everyone [else] is in their cells. I had trouble sleeping, and I spent most of that time just pacing my jail cell, but other than that, nothing. The second time, when I got sent upstate, I expected the whole Oz thing to happen, especially since I was a sex offender. But I was able to avoid all that by luck and just keeping my head down."


Really, it comes down to whether it's better to be stabbed or re-offend.



Prison sex is ok, cuz age.
It’s all prison sex. Thas the problem.

Quote:
However, please note that none of this applies to California prisons, which have implemented a strict pedophile conversion program ... wherein inmates routinely convert sex offenders from alive people to dead people. Charlie avoided that only by claiming that the people in the pictures he downloaded were 16-17, which "moved me down the target list."


WTF is the difference between 16-17 and 18-19? Some 20 yr olds are 16 and some 16 yr olds are 20-

People ARE hardwired to look at 17 year old girls and think they are beautiful- talk about a trojan horse. Of course if sex is naturally perverse than I spose that beauty- natural as it is- is perverse as well. ALL beauty is perverse in that world, right next to ours, left foot or right foot... Relative and perverse…

Don’t do whas natural, it’s sick and so everything sick become just as natural and arbitrary, moraline, circlejerk groupthink laws abound. Thas the trojan horse…

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:01 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Hope, BC
Vic Morrow wrote:
There is no difference between a child molester and a pedophile. There is only a difference between their actions. They are part of the same force. IOW, there is no such thing as a pedophile. There is only child abuse.

Everything is spectrum, everything is continuum. If there's no difference between a child molester and a (nonactive) pedophile then there's no difference between the latter and a "regularly" sexed person. If a man with no prior experience of this sort gets a hard-on when bouncing his six-year old cousin on his lap, is he now a pedophile?

Vic Morrow wrote:
Sex is all about procreation... About bringing children into this world, so they may live forever so. Sex is not some break that insists upon the fall from grace.

So couples who do not want children should not have sex? Couples with one post-menopausal woman should abstain?

Sex is not all about procreation. Errors of this sort have laid the groundwork for the edifice of sexual distortion/licentiousness which you rail against, and they continue to be used to fortify its structures. Choosing between regression to Victorian era moralism or Alefantis-land, most people choose the latter.

Vic Morrow wrote:
And you remember Matthew McConaughey's most famous quote, don't you?

Uh, no.... What'd he say?

Vic Morrow wrote:
If sex is all about degrading women, even in resistance- resistance w/ legislation and by ideology itself- then how are healthy children born?

Is sex all about degrading women? Since when? Degrading how?

Vic Morrow wrote:
Addiction nonsense. Separation of will and idea, substance and reflection. Dualism. Gnosis…

Addiction is a meaningful concept in the context, I think. Compulsion. Irresistible drives that cannot be counteracted by ethical convictions and so the latter are slowly eroded and reconfigured into rationalizations for the drives .

Vic Morrow wrote:
Chuck didn’t really know what he was doing was wrong. He was told it was wrong by hypocrites.

Human law has no bearing on right and wrong.

It's not a question of right and wrong but of what optimizes human experience and expression, and what sabotages it.

Vic Morrow wrote:
Don’t do whas natural, it’s sick and so everything sick become just as natural and arbitrary, moraline, circlejerk groupthink laws abound. Thas the trojan horse…

I get the sense you are caught squinting at a smokey mirror, circling jerkily to escape what you might see there.

All of this ^^^ is about you, but the focus is wholly outward. ?>^8

_________________
The only thing new in this world is the history you don't know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
Don’t do whas natural, it’s sick and so everything sick become just as natural and arbitrary, moraline, circlejerk groupthink laws abound. Thas the trojan horse…

I get the sense you are caught squinting at a smokey mirror, circling jerkily to escape what you might see there.

All of this ^^^ is about you, but the focus is wholly outward. ?>^8




The trojan horse is to conflate finding young women sexy and hot with finding actual children the same.

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
Chuck didn’t really know what he was doing was wrong. He was told it was wrong by hypocrites.

Human law has no bearing on right and wrong.


AND SO THEN JASUN WROTE:

It's not a question of right and wrong but of what optimizes human experience and expression, and what sabotages it.




I broke the law repeatedly in the form of drunk driving, and when younger, in possession of marijuana. Don't know if using other substances is actually illegal, I dunno much-

I harbor one kind of amazing guilt over these things. And it's amazingly superficial...

Human law means nothing.


I'm a fascist myself- not to the point of toyota's full of acolytes beating people w/ sticks in a real world sense- but in an interior sense, yeah. i think about that when confronted with humanity and it's handiwork.

Optimizing human experience and expression is impossible in the current human paradigm.

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
Addiction nonsense. Separation of will and idea, substance and reflection. Dualism. Gnosis…

Addiction is a meaningful concept in the context, I think. Compulsion. Irresistible drives that cannot be counteracted by ethical convictions and so the latter are slowly eroded and reconfigured into rationalizations for the drives .


Yeah, You're right.

'Addiction' isn't the problem tho, not at the bottom floor.

(Edited as I was trying to be nice, minstrelsy, in case other posters were reading. Jasun called me on it)

The renunciation of women, the flight from them- I KNOW this is the culprit.

When I say Flight From Women, I mean just that, actual women, but also a flight from Wisdom, Poetic knowledge and Intuition. Not the perverted ideas we confuse with those three.

It doesn't matter- It's too late anyhow. All we can do is protect children around us and be nice to people.

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
If sex is all about degrading women, even in resistance- resistance w/ legislation and by ideology itself- then how are healthy children born?


Is sex all about degrading women? Since when? Degrading how?



Yes, Sex, from what I can see of history, has been all about degrading women-

Sex in and of itself is not. It is about husbandry, about creating women. About satisfying desire, about rest.

Men embody a spirit, and just as the spirit hovers over the soul, so do men hover over women.

What we see is will and idea creating an imperfect storm, we always just try and change one or the other- both gotta go... the air will never be cleared otherwise... It has, is and will happen ~



Quote:
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
And you remember Matthew McConaughey's most famous quote, don't you?


Uh, no.... What'd he say?



Sorry, I didn't copy/paste correctly.

In the article there was a Gif from linklater's 'Dazed and Confused,' where Matthew McConaughey says something to the effect of 'High School Girls: I keep getting older, they stay the same age'

Matthew McConaughey is someone I cannot stand. If we're being honest. As an actor, he's pretty good, but I don't really care.

It is not unnatural for guys in their early 20's to desire girls in their late teens. By calling this 'pedophilia', as most people do- society opens the door to people having sex with actual children.

Pedophiles are NOT attracted to children, they HATE children. They do not desire children, they desire the destruction of children.

People who suggest otherwise ARE CHILD ABUSERS-

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
Sex is all about procreation... About bringing children into this world, so they may live forever so. Sex is not some break that insists upon the fall from grace.


So couples who do not want children should not have sex? Couples with one post-menopausal woman should abstain?

Sex is not all about procreation. Errors of this sort have laid the groundwork for the edifice of sexual distortion/licentiousness which you rail against, and they continue to be used to fortify its structures. Choosing between regression to Victorian era moralism or Alefantis-land, most people choose the latter.



If sex is about loving woman it stays innocent, victorious w/o victorian morals...

I love that more than anything but hate how homophobic it sounds, more than anything-

Everything is sabotaged ahead of time...

Full Disclosure: Society has women watching men dance around in thongs, thas the shining example of their perversion... I'm not a nice guy about that. The male female dynamic, as is, is extremely beautiful. The Poets haven't begun to touch on it. I don't take it's desecration lightly.

So far as people being all butthurt about what went down in high school- two fucks not given.

And oh yeah, all of this is falling on children-

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
Quote:
Quote:
Vic Morrow wrote:
There is no difference between a child molester and a pedophile. There is only a difference between their actions. They are part of the same force. IOW, there is no such thing as a pedophile. There is only child abuse.

Everything is spectrum, everything is continuum. If there's no difference between a child molester and a (nonactive) pedophile then there's no difference between the latter and a "regularly" sexed person. If a man with no prior experience of this sort gets a hard-on when bouncing his six-year old cousin on his lap, is he now a pedophile?



What you're getting at is my failure to communicate-

The man in the article is molesting children with his gaze... ??? I don't know what to say-

Here's where I always hit a brick wall-

What was chuck doing? He was partaking in child abuse... Good God, my mind shuts off here-

The last part, the bouncing cousin- that is involuntary arousal. Which I experience on the reg, as life itself arouses. Not as hardens per se, but a more essential arousal...

I worked at a Girl's Inc. for awhile, to save a little of myself from society's demands. It was probably the only job I've been good at. We had something I termed Involuntary Arousal Report- wet hair on healthy skin amid feminine giggles- that kind of thing. It spooks. If humanity wasn't intent on destroying children, we'd be able to find beauty in femininity w/o it being akin to rape. W/o it ruining...

The historical paradigms have failed children, failed innocence, failed women and promises hopeless failure as a man.

Jesus Christ, only way. Maybe Islam. Religion is infested with child abuse and war so people blame God.

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:01 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Hope, BC
good thread so far; wonder if it's luring people in or scaring them away.... !~>>

_________________
The only thing new in this world is the history you don't know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm
Posts: 27
Location: 'Nam
So far...

Edited cuz things took a turn, here.

_________________
Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue.


Last edited by Vic Morrow on Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Color scheme by ColorizeIt!